[Tagging] Subsequent wikipedia links

[Jo]

I'm strongly in favour of having the order as described here:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikidata

The advantage is that they sort near to what they apply to,
name:etymology:wikidata is near to name, operator:wikidata is near to
operator and so on.

I'm not sure why we have 2 pages describing wikidata in the wiki... both
with different content.

Polyglot


2014-06-30 13:19 GMT+02:00 Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk>:

> On 30 June 2014 10:34, Andreas Goss <andig88 at t-online.de> wrote:
> >> but I was aware it conflicts with the language version
> >
> >
> > The best solution would be to just use Wikidata. If editors supported
> that,
> > then they could also always show the titel of the Wikidata tag to avoid
> > errors.
> >
> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata
>
> I'm very strongly in faviour of tagging with Wikidata IDs; see my
> project proposal, at:
>
>    https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Pigsonthewing/Wikipedia
>
> but the level of understanding needed presents a high barrier to entry.
>
> I think we should continue to allow editors to tag with links to
> Wikipedia articles, but have the editing tool, or a bot, convert the
> tag to one with the equivalent Wikidata ID (or perhaps add a Wikidata
> tag, leaving the Wikipedia tag in situ).
>
> --
> Andy Mabbett
> @pigsonthewing
> http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140630/c0f6a540/attachment.html>