[Tagging] Subsequent wikipedia links
John Packer
john.packer7 at gmail.com
Mon Jun 30 11:36:47 UTC 2014
I would advise to be cautious with adding wikidata tags with a bot, because
a wikipedia article could have been moved and the wikidata tag would point
to a wrong page. (i.e. the bot should also perform the standard checks even
in this case)
I believe leaving the wikipedia tag in place while adding the wikidata tag
would be better in most cases.
The main reason is that the wikipedia key is well established and supported
in some sites, which either point a link to it or use some image from the
page.
2014-06-30 8:19 GMT-03:00 Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk>:
> On 30 June 2014 10:34, Andreas Goss <andig88 at t-online.de> wrote:
> >> but I was aware it conflicts with the language version
> >
> >
> > The best solution would be to just use Wikidata. If editors supported
> that,
> > then they could also always show the titel of the Wikidata tag to avoid
> > errors.
> >
> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata
>
> I'm very strongly in faviour of tagging with Wikidata IDs; see my
> project proposal, at:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Pigsonthewing/Wikipedia
>
> but the level of understanding needed presents a high barrier to entry.
>
> I think we should continue to allow editors to tag with links to
> Wikipedia articles, but have the editing tool, or a bot, convert the
> tag to one with the equivalent Wikidata ID (or perhaps add a Wikidata
> tag, leaving the Wikipedia tag in situ).
>
> --
> Andy Mabbett
> @pigsonthewing
> http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140630/30cd2815/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list