[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - drinkable
bryce2 at obviously.com
Sat Mar 1 18:53:18 UTC 2014
There are several smartphone apps that build in drinking water capability:
I helped develop one of them.
drinking_water=yes on a facility means that drinking water is available at
that location, and implies potable. It's
meant for the common cases such as where a toilet has a standard drinking
water fountain associated with it.
Generally toilets:disposal=flush and drinking_water=yes go together, but
not always. It's also very useful
as *drinking_water=no* to mark a place you might assume has water
available, but in fact does not. For example an urban train station,
mountain hut, or flush toilet without drinking water.
I prefer the term *potable,* as it is far less ambiguous. There's exactly
one meaning to that term, and it's easily looked up.
But the potable concept has mapping complications:
potable according to whom?
Potable because it's shaped like a drinking fountain?
Potable because a sign says it's potable
Potable because local tradition says it's potable?
The hard work here is defining what level of *promise * a tag of
*potable*implies. Who certified it and when?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging