[Tagging] governmental / public_administrative landuse are not commercial

Tom Pfeifer t.pfeifer at computer.org
Tue Nov 4 17:14:26 UTC 2014

Hm hm, somebody could not wait to start the page ;-)
I went through the mail thread so far, and tried to populate the
Talk page with some of the arguments, please add if I missed a point.
Maybe Martin could add some arguments why =public_administration
should be preferred?


Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 2014-11-04 11:06:

 > I'm opposing "civil" or "civic" by the definitions you cited above,
 > What about using more specific definitions, e.g. landuse=public_administration?

johnw wrote on 2014-11-04 03:56:
> Assembling a draft page. it is my first "draft page", so my syntax is kinda crap.
 > I will be working on the details of the proposal later today.
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dcivic
> Javbw
> On Nov 4, 2014, at 9:03 AM, Tom Pfeifer <t.pfeifer at computer.org> wrote:
>> ok, now we have landuse={governmental|public_administrative|civic|civil|public}
>> For my taste, public implies much more openness than we have from some
>> ministries, immigration offices etc, but is certainly a value to consider.
>> I would like to put a RFC page together towards the end of the week,
>> so it would be nice it the other contributors to this discussion would
>> indicate under which title we should start it.
>> tom

More information about the Tagging mailing list