[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water tap
matkoniecz at gmail.com
Thu Nov 13 07:33:42 UTC 2014
"If you can only chose between potable and non-potable" - in this case
tagging scheme is bad and should be changed to default to unknown value.
2014-11-12 23:44 GMT+01:00 Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com>:
> On 12/11/2014 8:34 PM, tagging-request at openstreetmap.org wrote:
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:06:15 +0100
> From: Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com> <pieren3 at gmail.com>
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> <tagging at openstreetmap.org> <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 62, Issue 31
> <CAPT3zJr3gsQAFYxeWXvnuYc2n_7tR-Git3JpuortmAUf2a18Kg at mail.gmail.com> <CAPT3zJr3gsQAFYxeWXvnuYc2n_7tR-Git3JpuortmAUf2a18Kg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at gmail.com> <matkoniecz at gmail.com> wrote:
> > No, unknown should be tagged as unknown. Even better - not tagged.
> +1 We don't tag what is unknown. Pierre
> 'We' know there is water there. That water can be used.
> If you can only chose between potable and non-potable, then you should
> chose non-potable. Filtering and treating non-potable water makes it
> potable .. I do this when in remote areas for my safety, particularly if
> I'm uncertain of the quality of the water. In some cases acess to water can
> be a life saver - thus it should be mapped no matter what the quality.
> Note change in Subject title - my appoliges for my error there.
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging