[Tagging] Vandalis on access page

[Hubert]

Thanks a lot, and yes You understood me correctly.

 

Regards

Hubert

 

From: Pee Wee [mailto:piewie32 at gmail.com] 
Sent: Mittwoch, 8. Oktober 2014 12:48
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Vandalis on access page

 

If I understand correctly you say it would be better if the wiki stated that the compulsory cycleway is drawn as a separte way. I think you are right. I could changed that in the wiki. Unfortunately the user Ulamm has changed the wiki (for the worse in my opinion) so I'll send him an email before I make any changes.

Cheers

 

PeeWee32

 

2014-10-08 12:34 GMT+02:00 Hubert <sg.forum at gmx.de>:

Thanks for the help and the links. That was my opinion, too.

I asked, because the use is not clear by just reading the definition and not looking at the examples. 

highway=road + cycleway=track + bicycle=use_sidepath together, without an additional highway=cycleway OSMWay (for example) seem correct by definition.

I can understand the confusion. Should the use be made more prominent in the description of the value?

 

Yours

Hubert


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging




-- 

Verbeter de wereld. Word mapper voor Openstreetmap <http://www.openstreetmap.org> .

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20141008/9337023d/attachment-0001.html>