[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - relation type=person

Marc Gemis marc.gemis at gmail.com
Wed Oct 15 09:26:41 UTC 2014


I was thinking the same until I though about all those war cemeteries of WO
I and WO II. You do not necessarily know where your relative is buried on
such a cemetery.
But this could be handled with a simple "inscription" tag, not need for a
relation.

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Martin Vonwald <imagic.osm at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> 2014-10-14 23:31 GMT+02:00 moltonel 3x Combo <moltonel at gmail.com>:
>
>> I think that "who is in which tomb" is information that does
>> belong in OSM.....
>>
>> Finding the tomb you want in a cemetery is *hard* and I'd love to be
>> able to use OSM for it (probably via a specialized smartphone app). A
>> particular tomb is like any POI, OSM should enable me to find it. Not
>> all cemeteries are well organised enough to have grave or even row
>> numbers. This is not only about noteworthy people either, one should
>> be able to map a cemetery exhaustively.
>>
>
> Simple question: why?
>
> If those are relatives of you, you should know where they are buried. If
> not, you should not care. Really not.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20141015/0c2422db/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list