[Tagging] problem with bicycle=designated

[Paul Johnson]

I'm going to throw Dallas and Tulsa into that mix, too.

On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Andre Engels <andreengels at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I myself, and I think more Dutch mappers, are using bicycle=designated
>> (along with highway=residential or perhaps highway=unclassified) for a
>> so called "fietsstraat" ("cyclestreet"). It's a road that has been set
>> up for bicycles, but has access for all road users. Often they have a
>> board like
>> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/84/Fietsstraat.JPG/207px-Fietsstraat.JPG
>> (text: "Cyclestreet - Cars are guests").
>>
>
> To the extent we have them, we call  those "Bicycle Boulevards" in the
> USA.  But these are invariably part of various cycle
> routes, and that factor is often more important.  Check Portland,
> Berkeley, Emeryville for examples.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140916/99363908/attachment.html>