[Tagging] name and brand tags
Johan C
osmned at gmail.com
Thu Sep 25 22:31:04 UTC 2014
It's not uncommon that actually the brand (e.g. Texaco) is being used on
either operator, or brand, or name. Only the latter is rendered, which can
be logical as in common speaking one easily says: I'll fill my car up at
the next Texaco' rather than saying 'I'll fill my car up at the fuel
station of Mr. xxx'
Due to the current Mapnik rendering I often use name where it's actually
the brand (yeh, I know, it's tagging for the renderer)
2014-09-25 4:34 GMT+02:00 Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org>:
> I'm pretty sure operator=Batman wouldn't work for name=Batman's Good Food,
> which is brand=Phillips 66...
>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Richard Welty <rwelty at averillpark.net>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 09/24/2014 10:22 AM, Philip Barnes wrote:
>>
>>> Besides in my experience petrol stations do have a name, it may not be
>>> obvious until you are close to the shop. Other than supermarket petrol
>>> stations, the name of the petrol station will appear on your receipt, not
>>> the name of the oil company. Phil (trigpoint)
>>>
>>
>> true, but are we better off with that in operator= than in
>> name= ?
>>
>> richard
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140926/8a763669/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list