[Tagging] [Imports] Mechanical Tagging Proposal - dump_station - conditional

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Thu Apr 2 00:34:19 UTC 2015

On 2/04/2015 11:10 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Andy Allan <gravitystorm at gmail.com 
> <mailto:gravitystorm at gmail.com>> wrote:
>     On 1 April 2015 at 17:21, Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com
>     <mailto:bryce2 at obviously.com>> wrote:
>     > The main downside however is that recycling:excrement=yes/no is
>     one of the
>     > tagging methods that currently renders.
>     > Retagging will cause the feature not to render on the osm-carto
>     stylesheet.
>     No it doesn't - the "recycling:excrement" key isn't in our list of
>     keys that we use, so changing it will make no difference.
> It's generally combined with *amenity=recycling *or sometimes 
> *amenity=caravan_site* to force the rendering.
> For example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1367964488
> Which is a hugely common theme in the cleanup work I've done.  
> Osm-carto rendering support is far more conservative than tagging 
> behavior.  The inverse of /"render and they will map"/ is "don't 
> render and they'll find a way around the problem anyway".

Excellent work by the mappers to see their work rendered. 8-)
I think there needs to be more diversity in the rendering .. to match 
the diversity of the mappers.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150402/3d78150c/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list