[Tagging] For your comment: New template: Unit summary
sommerluk at gmail.com
Fri Apr 3 09:25:52 UTC 2015
> I'd ask the following be excluded ?
> cm (used in the clothing and foot ware trades ..not an OSM thing )
I don’t think that there is a need to “exclude” some values (and
“allow” anything else). Insteat, I think there is a need to “allow”
some values (and exclude anything else).
2015-04-03 9:16 GMT, Lukas Sommer <sommerluk at gmail.com>:
>>> So please move it to the “Proposal/” namespace.
>> That's not possible for a working template,
>> Note the template is not USED,
> And it should also not be used, because it’s just your personal
> proposal for a discussion. So there is no need to have a working
> template. So please move it to the “Proposal/” namespace.
> 2015-04-03 8:51 GMT, Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com>:
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Martin Vonwald <imagic.osm at gmail.com>
>>> +1 for the deletion (or at least move it to the proposal namespace). A
>>> simply direct link to Map_Features/Units should be enough.
>> The majority of existing tags have a summary of the Map_Features/Units
>> embedded on their own pages.
>> That's a good thing for tl;dr readers.
> Lukas Sommer
More information about the Tagging