[Tagging] For your comment: New template: Unit summary

Lukas Sommer sommerluk at gmail.com
Fri Apr 3 09:31:45 UTC 2015


> The majority of existing tags have a summary of the Map_Features/Units embedded on their own pages.
> That's a good thing for tl;dr readers.

Map_Features/Units isn’t a big wiki page. It’s really short (3
sentences and some tables). Maybe for keys like “width” it could be
usefull to have only the part about distances (and not the part about
weight). But dropping the rest of the content makes things confusing.

2015-04-03 9:25 GMT, Lukas Sommer <sommerluk at gmail.com>:
>> I'd ask the following be excluded ?
>> cm (used in the clothing and foot ware trades ..not an OSM thing )
>> cubits
>
> I don’t think that there is a need to “exclude” some values (and
> “allow” anything else). Insteat, I think there is a need to “allow”
> some values (and exclude anything else).
>
> 2015-04-03 9:16 GMT, Lukas Sommer <sommerluk at gmail.com>:
>>>> So please move it to the “Proposal/” namespace.
>>> That's not possible for a working template,
>>
>>> Note the template is not USED,
>>
>> And it should also not be used, because it’s just your personal
>> proposal for a discussion. So there is no need to have a working
>> template. So please move it to the “Proposal/” namespace.
>>
>> 2015-04-03 8:51 GMT, Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com>:
>>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Martin Vonwald <imagic.osm at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for the deletion (or at least move it to the proposal namespace). A
>>>> simply direct link to Map_Features/Units should be enough.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The majority of existing tags have a summary of the Map_Features/Units
>>> embedded on their own pages.
>>> That's a good thing for tl;dr readers.
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Lukas Sommer
>>
>
>
> --
> Lukas Sommer
>


-- 
Lukas Sommer



More information about the Tagging mailing list