[Tagging] For your comment: New template: Unit summary

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at gmail.com
Fri Apr 3 12:00:00 UTC 2015

I am against adding yet another template to wiki, intended to be used as
part of article

Many pages are already obnoxious to edit because on editing it turns out
that table
is hidden in a template - so it is necessary to open another page.

"It also promotes explicit numbers (e.g. 20 m) over implicit ones ( e.g. 20

I am also against explicitly mentioning default units. I can understand
using feet (but I
am not happy about it). But expecting people using standard units (meters
for height etc)
to waste time on making clear that they are not using weird ones is not the
best idea.

Obviously, I supporting using explicit numbers.

2015-04-03 7:21 GMT+02:00 Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com>:

> To try and make unit description consistent here is a proposed template.
> This would apply to tags like ele, est_width, circumference, height,
> width, maxwidth, minwidth, distance.  A separate table could be made for
> speed & weight.
> Use as follows:
> {{Unit_Tagging_Length|tag_name|furlongs}}
> The template is defined at:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Unit_Tagging_Length
> Other unit pages include:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Units
> ------------------
> This particular summary promotes the notion of "human centred tagging",
> with parsers left to make conversion to computer readable units.  It also
> promotes explicit numbers (e.g. 20 m) over implicit ones ( e.g. 20 ).
> Given the variety of unit styles already in the database, this seems to be
> the most pragmatic approach.
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150403/c8f372b2/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list