[Tagging] Proposed features/camp type=*

Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com
Tue Apr 14 18:39:18 UTC 2015


The voting was officially closed by today, but I'll leave it open for
another week. So far 13 people have voted.

Met vriendelijke groet/with kind regards,

*Jan van Bekkum*
www.DeEinderVoorbij.nl

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Jan van Bekkum <jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I agree that we should not use the star system or six categories It is
> becoming far too complex for mappers and renderers. This level of
> refinement must be achieved with additional attributes or extra amenities
> in a relation.
>
> I really do want to keep *non-designated* as currently proposed. It was
> my main reason to start with the proposal. I understand it is not important
> in western countries, but it is vital in Africa and the Middle East. It is
> a site with the opportunistic blessing and amenity use of a hotel/ hostel,
> etc.
>
> Why do we need to keep trekking? Isn't it a special case of unimproved?
> Summarized my preference is
>
>    - Designated
>    - Unimproved (although I like the word Basic better)
>    - Non-designated
>    - Wild_camp_site: separate namespace tag for unimproved without
>    blessing
>
>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150414/ad3f6e0d/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list