[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - trailhead

[fly]

Am 14.04.2015 um 23:35 schrieb Bryce Nesbitt:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:40 PM, fly <lowflight66 at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Why not map the amenity/features as own objects ?
>>
>> If it is important for the route relations I rather have a new role
>> similar to guidepost for the starting/end node.
> 
> I agree the toilet/parking/information sign should all be tagged separately.
> 
> But there are cases where the trail-head has a given and well known NAME.
> So far I generally tag that on the parking area, but parking is not
> necessarily a requirement for having a trailhead.

Sounds like place=location then.

Cheers fly