[Tagging] proposal - camp_site=

John Willis johnw at mac.com
Thu Apr 23 04:46:18 UTC 2015


I had a question about basic - 

I understand it's amenity level (flat spot + access) but the legality bit being the only qualifier:

Would it just be for places that are somehow signed as for camping(designated), places where camping is legal and common (informal [yet legally allowed] existing site), or just any place that's legal that the mapper wishes to tag (legal).

I assume you mean designated + informal existing, not just anywhere technically legal. 

I would change the wording to be something like "for signed camping areas or informal yet legal spots where camping is common."

People can fudge the "common" to mean what they want, but without it, in some places that could mean every single roadside turnout could be marked as a "campground" - which would not be so helpful. 

Otherwise it looks really good. 

I look forward to voting yes ^_^

Javbw

> On Apr 23, 2015, at 7:42 AM, David Bannon <dbannon at internode.on.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> OK, I think the discussion on camp_site= has settled down and now
> concentrates on things that are just outside the current proposal and
> probably need to stay there for now. Thoughts, yes, no ?
> 
> I have mentioned on the proposal page tagging of individual pitches and
> declared that out of scope for now.
> 
> I have added backcountry=yes as a possible tag to be used in association
> with this new tag
> 
> If there are no objections or further suggestions, I'll move to voting
> in a day or so.
> 
> please see -
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Camp_Site
> 
> David
> 
>> On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 14:23 +0300, Dave Swarthout wrote:
>> Would it not be ok to say (eg) -
>> 
>> tourism=camp_site
>> camp_site=basic
>> backcountry=yes
>> 
>> 
>> That's exactly what I was proposing. It isn't a tag describing the
>> amenities of the camp so much as to indicate that it is a certain type
>> of camp, one not accessible by vehcles. In New Zealand I believe these
>> would be called trekking sites. I have no experience with Australia
>> but I'm guessing the term would mean the same thing.
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
>> <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging



More information about the Tagging mailing list