[Tagging] proposal - camp_site=

David Bannon dbannon at internode.on.net
Wed Apr 22 22:42:30 UTC 2015

OK, I think the discussion on camp_site= has settled down and now
concentrates on things that are just outside the current proposal and
probably need to stay there for now. Thoughts, yes, no ?

I have mentioned on the proposal page tagging of individual pitches and
declared that out of scope for now.

I have added backcountry=yes as a possible tag to be used in association
with this new tag

If there are no objections or further suggestions, I'll move to voting
in a day or so.

please see -


On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 14:23 +0300, Dave Swarthout wrote:
> Would it not be ok to say (eg) -
> tourism=camp_site
> camp_site=basic
> backcountry=yes
> That's exactly what I was proposing. It isn't a tag describing the
> amenities of the camp so much as to indicate that it is a certain type
> of camp, one not accessible by vehcles. In New Zealand I believe these
> would be called trekking sites. I have no experience with Australia
> but I'm guessing the term would mean the same thing.
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:

More information about the Tagging mailing list