[Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite
brad.neuhauser at gmail.com
Thu Apr 30 15:12:31 UTC 2015
+1 on addr:unit or ref over addr:housenumber. I think ref makes more sense
than addr:unit on remote/isolated pitches (ie hike-in sites, not drive-in).
In addition, I've seen cases where individual pitches are named instead of
numbered. It's not mentioned, but to clarify, I'm assuming that would just
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 30/04/2015 11:17 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:37 PM, John Willis <johnw at mac.com> wrote:
>> That sounds like “tagging for the renderer” to me.
>> When rendering lags tagging behavior, there is that temptation.
> Rendering will always lag behind tagging.
> If tagging is to be rendered then adding another tag to have it rendered
> will lead to the original tag being ignored by renders .. Catch 22.
> Also, it's more likely to be rendered if the tagging is well-defined and
sensible. If the tagging is awkwardly trying to fit into a particular
rendering, or overly complicated, it's probably not going to be used by
I think detailed renderings of campgrounds sounds like a perfect case for a
specialized map, maybe on a new map, or added to one of these:
So I wouldn't sweat whether it's rendered right now or not, someone is
going to scratch that itch.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging