[Tagging] Contact:* prefix
davefox at madasafish.com
Thu Aug 6 22:38:44 UTC 2015
On 04/08/2015 14:07, Michał Brzozowski wrote:
> This means just not to add contact details of private persons like me or you.
OK, but it needs to be amended because that's not what it says
> As per contact: prefix, opponents argue it's redundant. Isn't so addr:
> as well? In reality keys with and without contact: are equivalent.
> My argument for using it is that new popular services for
> communication appear every year nowadays, and contact: prefix makes it
> clear and easy to standardize. You can have contact:facebook,
> contact:twitter, contact:instagram and so on.
I don't see how it standardizes when, as you point out, the popular
content for the key on the right ie facebook, twitter etc varies yearly.
If data manipulators want to process 'contacts' they still have to
perform the same parsing so there's no gain there.
For some tag developments i can see the benefits, but I'm struggling
with this one I'm afraid.
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Dave F. <davefox at madasafish.com> wrote:
>> I remember a discussion a while back about this. As the page makes no
>> mention of the logic behind, could someone please remind me of the reasoning
>> & advantage over straight forward phone, fax, website etc.
>> "You should only add contact informations to POIs and not to any private
>> By 'POI' does he mean 'public company'?
>> Dave F.
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
More information about the Tagging