Shawn K. Quinn
skquinn at rushpost.com
Mon Aug 24 20:14:57 UTC 2015
On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 19:56 +0200, François Lacombe wrote:
> Hi Mateusz,
> It seems this tag is a combination of waterway=canal and disused=yes.
> I'm not so in favor of such value (derelict_canal). There are two
> different information in one value.
I agree. This was an absolutely awful, boneheaded choice for a tag, when
we already had a much better way to tag the same thing.
I have no issue with automatically replacing the existing
waterway=derelict_canal with waterway=canal and disused=yes. There's
just no reason to keep the former tag.
Shawn K. Quinn <skquinn at rushpost.com>
More information about the Tagging