[Tagging] Buildings mixing residential and commercial use
Danijel Schorlemmer
osm at schorlemmer.net
Mon Aug 31 06:53:36 UTC 2015
What about
building=apartments
building:use=residential;commercial (or retail)
building=mixed doesn't seem to me to be a useful building tag. The building
tag should describe the type of building, not its use.
Cheers
On Monday, August 31, 2015 10:26:27 AM Warin wrote:
> On 31/08/2015 8:58 AM, John Willis wrote:
> >> On Aug 31, 2015, at 12:05 AM, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> uilding=commercial is quite suspect.
> >
> > To me, there are 2 basic types of mixed use buildings.
> >
> > mixed_use_urban
> > And
> > mixed_use_house
> >
> > There are so many different combinations of retail, residential, hotel,
> > and commercial (and in come cases, attraction) That as long as there is
> > some kind of residential space (apartments/condos), then it would be
> > mixed_use_urban. This is especially true if the public facing part (the
> > bottom floor or the side towards the street) are non-residential use (a
> > business/shop/not parking).
> snip
>
> > So i suggest those two building types to denote these two basic types of
> > mixed use.
> I think it better to bite the bullet and start sub tagging correctly ...
> thus for a retail mixed with apartments
>
> building=mixed (or =yes etc)
> building:retail=yes
> building:apartment=yes
>
> ? More thoughts please...
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
More information about the Tagging
mailing list