[Tagging] Buildings mixing residential and commercial use

[Daniel Koć]

W dniu 31.08.2015 14:17, Tod Fitch napisał(a):

> So building=apartments obviously is not accurate. Nor is
> building=retail. Apartments here are considered commercial so I could
> see a mapper using building=commercial even though OSM would frown on
> that. It makes sense to me to tag that building style as
> building=mixed.

This value could be also used for highways to make clear distinction 
between not-constructed foot-only way and multiple other uses (like 
constructed foot+bicycle).

-- 
"The train is always on time / The trick is to be ready to put your bags 
down" [A. Cohen]