[Tagging] Waste_collection - a new Feature Proposal - RFC
daveswarthout at gmail.com
Sat Feb 14 01:41:21 UTC 2015
I think amenity=waste_disposal with sub tags for the type of waste being
disposed of could be a workable solution. It's more complicated than using
another top level tag like dump_station, etc., for sewage but allows for
more specificity when desired. This seems to be a good, general purpose,
top level tag.
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 8:33 AM, David Bannon <dbannon at internode.on.net>
> OK folks, here it really is ! A small group have identified a need for
> a new high level tag, waste_collection=
> Likely values to be identified in a latter and separate process. Not
> unlike those used for waste=, a subtag of amenity=waste_disposal;waste=*
> The background is that while we started talking about improving tags
> that apply to campsites, we quickly realised that waste (rubbish, trash,
> garbage, human waste, animal waste) exists on its own, usually far too
> much of it ! I consider the small amount of data in OSM referring to
> waste a sure indication that this is an unaddressed need.
> Please comment on the proposed name : key:waste_disposal and its high
> A discussion about possible values would be useful but we consider that
> we should get the key up first and then talk about values. Please see
> On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 12:00 +1100, Warin wrote:
> > On 14/02/2015 11:43 AM, David Bannon wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 11:16 +1100, Warin wrote:
> > > .....
> > > > I'd split the voting up into
> > > .....
> > > > waste, collection is the more frequent case.
> > > > .... waste_collection
> > > Agreed, you said that in your previous note but it slipped my mind by
> > > time I responded. Sigh ...
> > >
> > > When you say, "split the voting", are you suggesting that its
> > > sufficiently 'ripe' to be asking for a formal (ie in the wiki) vote
> > > yet ? Bearing in mind we have had only you, me and Dave S contribute to
> > > the discussion ?
> > >
> > > David
> > >
> > >
> > You asked for 'lets have some hands up' .. that implies a vote of
> > sorts.. .. but I'd not move to a formal vote yet?
> > I'd like some more peoples thoughts on the issue and words.. more
> > comments. Support .. and criticism .. just an interest.
> > There is a required minimum time for comments - two weeks .. with a
> > name change to waste_collection perhaps two weeks from the change of
> > name? I'd suggest a new proposal page with the new name .. provided
> > there is some support for the name .. apart from you & me? And any
> > better names put forward?
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging