[Tagging] Waste_collection - a new Feature Proposal - RFC
dbannon at internode.on.net
Sat Feb 14 01:33:29 UTC 2015
OK folks, here it really is ! A small group have identified a need for
a new high level tag, waste_collection=
Likely values to be identified in a latter and separate process. Not
unlike those used for waste=, a subtag of amenity=waste_disposal;waste=*
The background is that while we started talking about improving tags
that apply to campsites, we quickly realised that waste (rubbish, trash,
garbage, human waste, animal waste) exists on its own, usually far too
much of it ! I consider the small amount of data in OSM referring to
waste a sure indication that this is an unaddressed need.
Please comment on the proposed name : key:waste_disposal and its high
A discussion about possible values would be useful but we consider that
we should get the key up first and then talk about values. Please see
On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 12:00 +1100, Warin wrote:
> On 14/02/2015 11:43 AM, David Bannon wrote:
> > On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 11:16 +1100, Warin wrote:
> > .....
> > > I'd split the voting up into
> > .....
> > > waste, collection is the more frequent case.
> > > .... waste_collection
> > Agreed, you said that in your previous note but it slipped my mind by
> > time I responded. Sigh ...
> > When you say, "split the voting", are you suggesting that its
> > sufficiently 'ripe' to be asking for a formal (ie in the wiki) vote
> > yet ? Bearing in mind we have had only you, me and Dave S contribute to
> > the discussion ?
> > David
> You asked for 'lets have some hands up' .. that implies a vote of
> sorts.. .. but I'd not move to a formal vote yet?
> I'd like some more peoples thoughts on the issue and words.. more
> comments. Support .. and criticism .. just an interest.
> There is a required minimum time for comments - two weeks .. with a
> name change to waste_collection perhaps two weeks from the change of
> name? I'd suggest a new proposal page with the new name .. provided
> there is some support for the name .. apart from you & me? And any
> better names put forward?
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Tagging