[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:rubbish=
bryce2 at obviously.com
Tue Feb 17 18:30:29 UTC 2015
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:50 AM, David Bannon <dbannon at internode.on.net>
> On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 21:34 -0800, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> > The real question is what type of tag would attract rendering
> > support. amenity=dump_station is easier to deal with,
> > as it's a single level that maps to the commonly understood function
> > of a place to dump a sewage holding tank.
> Bryce, I agree, my own interest here is I'm heading out on a trip, in an
> RV, in a couple of months. I'd like to map these things, need to know
> where they are.
> My particular interest here is camping and emptying my holding tank, but
> there is a huge list of other people who have some other pet need. I
> understand the community is (reportedly) reluctant to cater to each of
> those needs individually with yet another amenity tag.
> Maybe I am wrong, lets see who stands up ?
It's hard to go far wrong with a dedicated tag for a feature with:
1) A strong clear definition
2) That features prominently on printed recreation maps, with a standard
3) Has a large community of mappers behind it.
However that said, the large mapping community for RV dumps is not on OSM:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging