[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:rubbish=
Jan van Bekkum
jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com
Wed Feb 18 06:18:24 UTC 2015
I vote for the middle option: waste=dump_station. My main reason is that it
consistent with the existing system and that there will not be yet another
node if more than one type of waste is collected.
On Wed Feb 18 2015 at 4:52:39 AM David Bannon <dbannon at internode.on.net>
> On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 08:52 +1100, Warin wrote:
> > go with a new top level tag ... waste_collection=*
> > -----------------------------
> > To say there is no support for a new top level tag waste_collection=*
> > based on the talk here .. well there are lots of people not saying
> > anything .. possibly they have nothing to add, or just see it as a
> > good idea and may vote later or see it as a lost cause. I too would
> > like to see them speak up - any direction they chose. But so few speak
> > up. a few more vote.
> Warin, lets face facts, only you and I have spoken in favour of
> waste_collection=. Two have spoken against it. Need I remind you of the
> words of the OSM Guardians before they left this mortal world =
> "Yea, be there but one nay vote, there must be no less than 10 and 5
> votes, less the proposal be lost" The First Wiki, chap 7, verse 4
> waste_collection= is not going to fly !
> So, we need to chose between
> * leaving it as it is - easy choice
> * Adding dump_station to waste= - consistent with whats there now.
> * Adding dump_station to amenity= - easier to map (?)
> Honestly, by a small margin, I'd prefer middle option. If we move human
> waste out of waste= why not the others ?
> But I don't care ! Please, put something up for a vote and I'll vote
> for it. Just get it done, this has gone on for far too long.
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging