matkoniecz at gmail.com
Thu Feb 19 08:00:16 UTC 2015
I think that attraction=maze is better than attraction:type (shorter,
without colon, "type" is not
really adding anything useful, clear detailing of tourism=attraction).
2015-02-19 3:59 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com>:
> If it's of interest to outsiders it seems like an attraction. Thus how
> *name=Happy Tunnel Kiddie Maze*
> *website=http://maze.example.org/ <http://maze.example.org/>*
> You want all those similar features (maze/tube hill/ride/garden/water
> park/whatever) to show up on a tourism/visitor type map.
> This is also a clear case where the existing maze tags could be mass
> retagged to the new scheme.
> You just want to be clear if a given feature is PART of a larger
> "attraction" (e.g.
> one ride in a water park), or if it's the high level feature (e.g. the
> water park itself).
> See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dtheme_park
> and the associated tagging.
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging