[Tagging] ?=maze

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at gmail.com
Thu Feb 19 08:00:16 UTC 2015


I think that attraction=maze is better than attraction:type (shorter,
without colon, "type" is not
really adding anything useful, clear detailing of tourism=attraction).

2015-02-19 3:59 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com>:

> If it's of interest to outsiders it seems like an attraction.  Thus how
> about:
>
>
> *tourism=attraction*
> *attraction:type=maze*
> *name=Happy Tunnel Kiddie Maze*
> *website=http://maze.example.org/ <http://maze.example.org/>*
>
>
> You want all those similar features (maze/tube hill/ride/garden/water
> park/whatever) to show up on a tourism/visitor type map.
> This is also a clear case where the existing maze tags could be mass
> retagged to the new scheme.
>
> -----------------------
> You just want to be clear if a given feature is PART of a larger
> "attraction" (e.g.
> one ride in a water park), or if it's the high level feature (e.g. the
> water park itself).
> See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dtheme_park
> and the associated tagging.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150219/dad92e86/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list