johnw at mac.com
Thu Feb 19 09:48:33 UTC 2015
I think it should be k kept under attraction, because a large mappable maze is certainly an interest of tourists - especially if it is part of a larger complex.
Then it would be
or attraction:maze=hedge instead of attraction=maze + maze=hedge (so a generic maze would be attraction:maze=yes) I actually like this better.
I don’t know which is better, but it certainly feels that any large maze - new or historic - is a form of attraction, so it should go into that - Especially if we are going to have a definition for special gardens in there as well.
I think we can just label it historic or heritage or something if it fits for the maze
> Other: wall, boundary_stone, well, boundary_marker, folly
is a maze a “folly”? I think it is.
> On Feb 19, 2015, at 6:27 PM, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19/02/2015 8:15 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>> The problem with
>> Is that attraction is a top level tag, not a subtag of tourism=attraction.
>> So maybe:
> I'd do
> tourism=maze ... similar to zoo, theme park, museum, artwork.
> and if necessary sub tag under that .. there are lots of different types .. see wikipedia
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maze <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maze>
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging