[Tagging] ?=maze

Richard Z. ricoz.osm at gmail.com
Thu Feb 19 11:43:41 UTC 2015

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 06:48:33PM +0900, johnw wrote:
> I think it should be k kept under attraction, because a large mappable maze is certainly an interest of tourists - especially if it is part of a larger complex. 
> Then it would be 
> tourism=attraction
> attraction=maze
> maze=hedge
> or attraction:maze=hedge  instead of attraction=maze + maze=hedge  (so a generic maze would be attraction:maze=yes) I actually like this better. 
> I don’t know which is better, but it certainly feels that any large maze - new or historic - is a form of attraction, so it should go into that - Especially if we are going to have a definition for special gardens in there as well.  

in addition to that I think any large enough maze should be mapped with 
highway=maze or highway=path, dead end markers and emergency exits.


More information about the Tagging mailing list