[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=storage: additional values for key parking

[John Willis]

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 20, 2015, at 9:47 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 2015-02-20 13:42 GMT+01:00 Jan van Bekkum <jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com>:
>> So it would become:
>> shop=vehicle_storage
>> covered=yes
>> motorcar=yes
>> caravan=yes
> 
> 
> I wouldn't use the "shop" key but something like "amenity", and "motorcar" is a legal access restriction, so should be something different as well.
> 
From my earlier post :
~~~
Amenity=Vehicle_storage sounds great for when it is an amenity of a lager facility
shop=vehicle_storage sounds great for a business that offers this service. 

If you are looking for Vehicle storage services, a bunch of arrows popping up on lots in planned communities and military bases that you can never use isn’t very useful. 

~~~

You are right about the vehicle tag - what values do you suggest?

> cheers,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150221/c121559f/attachment.html>