[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=storage: additional values for key parking
John F. Eldredge
john at jfeldredge.com
Sat Feb 21 18:30:43 UTC 2015
If the use of the vehicle storage is limited to certain people, such as
residents of a particular neighborhood, use access tags as well. It then
becomes the responsibility of the renderer to check these tags.
John F. Eldredge -- john at jfeldredge.com
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot
drive out hate; only love can do that." Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
On February 20, 2015 4:34:16 PM John Willis <johnw at mac.com> wrote:
> Sent from my iPhone
> > On Feb 20, 2015, at 9:47 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> > 2015-02-20 13:42 GMT+01:00 Jan van Bekkum <jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com>:
> >> So it would become:
> >> shop=vehicle_storage
> >> covered=yes
> >> motorcar=yes
> >> caravan=yes
> > I wouldn't use the "shop" key but something like "amenity", and
> "motorcar" is a legal access restriction, so should be something different
> as well.
> From my earlier post :
> Amenity=Vehicle_storage sounds great for when it is an amenity of a lager
> shop=vehicle_storage sounds great for a business that offers this service.
> If you are looking for Vehicle storage services, a bunch of arrows popping
> up on lots in planned communities and military bases that you can never use
> isn’t very useful.
> You are right about the vehicle tag - what values do you suggest?
> > cheers,
> > Martin
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging