[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=storage: additional values for key parking

[John F. Eldredge]

If the use of the vehicle storage is limited to certain people, such as 
residents of a particular neighborhood, use access tags as well. It then 
becomes the responsibility of the renderer to check these tags.

-- 
John F. Eldredge -- john at jfeldredge.com
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot 
drive out hate; only love can do that." Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.



On February 20, 2015 4:34:16 PM John Willis <johnw at mac.com> wrote:

> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Feb 20, 2015, at 9:47 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > 2015-02-20 13:42 GMT+01:00 Jan van Bekkum <jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com>:
> >> So it would become:
> >> shop=vehicle_storage
> >> covered=yes
> >> motorcar=yes
> >> caravan=yes
> >
> >
> > I wouldn't use the "shop" key but something like "amenity", and 
> "motorcar" is a legal access restriction, so should be something different 
> as well.
> >
> From my earlier post :
> ~~~
> Amenity=Vehicle_storage sounds great for when it is an amenity of a lager 
> facility
> shop=vehicle_storage sounds great for a business that offers this service.
>
> If you are looking for Vehicle storage services, a bunch of arrows popping 
> up on lots in planned communities and military bases that you can never use 
> isn’t very useful.
>
> ~~~
>
> You are right about the vehicle tag - what values do you suggest?
>
> > cheers,
> > Martin
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
> ----------
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150221/76afa022/attachment.html>