[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:waste_collection

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Sat Feb 21 04:30:04 UTC 2015

On 21/02/2015 2:43 PM, David Bannon wrote:
> Warin (and Bryce), would it be appropriate to cross reference this
> proposal with the one for amenity=sanitary_dump_station ??
> They clearly relate to each other and voters may need to consider both.

I consider those that vote against either .. would/should be inclined to 
vote for the other? To otherwise means that a 'sanitary dump station' 
should not be mapped.
> Should it be documented how to handle a situation if both get up ?
> While Bryce's proposal covers a small subset of waste_collection=, it
> could be approved before the corresponding tag for waste_collection is.
If waste_collection= gets the go ahead then further proposals would 
follow .. some of them would be proposals that would depreciate/replace 
tags presently in use. That could include sanitary_dump_station.

I'll add something appropriate to waste_collection ...  in the voting 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150221/20575093/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list