[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:waste_collection

Marc Gemis marc.gemis at gmail.com
Sun Feb 22 07:26:56 UTC 2015

Maybe we have to be able to specify per type whether it is waste or
recycling and whether you have to pay for it or not.

e.g. for the "containerparks" (that's how we call them here in Flanders)


the values are not good, but maybe you can come up with something better.

On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:

>  On 22/02/2015 9:55 AM, Marc Gemis wrote:
>  I see no need to replace the recycling scheme, sorry.
> Ok ... do you see a need to have a key waste_collection=  at all?  Or
> should OSM continue to have amenity= values made for each kind of waste
> collection point? Thoughts?
> There is no way to exclude or to include recycling in the key
> waste_collection= ... unless it become even larger such as key
> waste_collection_recycling= key waste_collection_non_recycling= .
> Do remember that the tag values I have given (*as in one person!*) are *suggested
> values* .. each value should have its own proposal .. and discussion.
> Including the recycling issue IF it is accepted as a key.
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150222/d58e7969/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list