[Tagging] Tagging established, unofficial and wild campings
61sundowner at gmail.com
Mon Feb 23 22:05:28 UTC 2015
The present tagging of camp sites can (if tagged) provide
discrimination/distinction between those that charge a fee and those
Jan, think more about what your trying to achieve? I don't think it is
about the fee .. but about the specialisation of the site? It is going
to be difficult to put into words... Wild, informal ... primitive... vs
organised, formal ? I'd not distinguish between a camp site that is
only a camp site and a camp site that is associated with a
hotel/pub/motel. The location of the two on the map would give you that
Don't worry about it being rendered .. just the tagging. Get that right
On 24/02/2015 8:37 AM, David Bannon wrote:
> Jan, I am afraid I would have to disagree. Reading your text, the
> distinguishing feature seems to be the fee ? Here in Australia, there
> are very many camp sites, often reasonably formal ones that don't charge
> a fee.
> They typically don't provide a lot of facilities but are very popular
> with caravan and the occasional tent camper. A good percentage have
> drinking quality water and toilets available.
> While many are "in the bush" we do see a number of smaller, remote towns
> establish such free camp site to attract visitors who will spend money
> in their town.
> To tag them as wild_camp would be a misnomer IMHO. They are sometimes
> described as "free camps". The word "free" is used as much as in "free
> speech" as it is in "free beer".
> But I do like the idea of a category of camp site. Makes a lot of sense.
> Maybe the solution is to add my category to your list ?
> On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 17:27 +0000, Jan van Bekkum wrote:
>> Please have a look at this proposal.
>> Jan van Bekkum
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging