[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (traffic signals group)
johnw at mac.com
Thu Feb 26 05:55:18 UTC 2015
If group is not a good word, then "set" is a good alternative.
> On Feb 26, 2015, at 8:33 AM, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
> This could be confused with the coordination of traffic signals along a length of road or even a district wide coordination of traffic light signals.
> I think it needs some words that restrict it to a single intersection?
> And possibly some thought to where a length of road (many intersections) or a district wide coordination of traffic signals occurs? If the name 'traffic signals group' is taken what name would you give this? May be a different name for this 'group'? Such as ? traffic signals set?
>> On 26/02/2015 8:59 AM, Lukas Sommer wrote:
>> This is a request for comments for the proposal
>> The original author is Sanderd17. With the consent of him, I did some
>> supplementing. Thanks to Sanerd17!
>> Unlike the proposal “Proposed features/Traffic Signals” of Lukas
>> Schaus, this is _not_ about traffic light circuits, but just about
>> grouping together all nodes with highway=traffic_signals that belong
>> to a traffic signal system at one place. This could be useful in
>> Japan, where traffic signal systems have namen. (Thanks to nyampire
>> and javbw for suggestions and comments.) This could be useful for
>> routing/turn-to-turn navigation engines to calculate better the time
>> penalty for the traffic signal system.
>> Best regards
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging