[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Temperature=
61sundowner at gmail.com
Thu Feb 26 21:58:49 UTC 2015
On 26/02/2015 8:33 PM, Kotya Karapetyan wrote:
> Hi Warin,
> Why rush? I don't think it's a question of how long the discussion
> took. The proposal still has open issues, some of which are even
> mentioned in the proposal page itself. So what are we voting for? It
> would be better to close the open issues (or at least remove the
> options that cause them), and vote for something definite.
> I vote against, not because I am against the proposal, but because it
> is not finished yet.
The 'outstanding issue' is heated and cooled? For an area that is
'adjusted' for only some of the time?
Describing that using the word temperature .... I have not solution for
that .. and no one has suggested one.
For example an object can be heated by 100 K .. and still be cold .. if
depends on what the temperature of the object was at the start. So the
descriptions 'heated' or 'cooled' are not able to be described using a
simple temperature= tag. To 'discuss' this around and around for lots of
time is pointless.
I think the 'heating' and 'cooling' problem needs a lot more thought ..
but temperature= is not the solution for it.
The 'adjustable' value has been criticised as having no limits ... the
suggestion is to use a sub tag say for example adjustable:range=cold to
hot. That would need another proposal.
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Well it has been 3 weeks for the comments .. a few changes/modifications,
>> thanks for those.
>> Time now to vote...
>> Review the whole page - from the top
>> Or go straight to voting
>> amenity=reception_desk voting in 2 days time
>> waste_collection voting in 8 days time
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging