[Tagging] Breakdown bays?
imagic.osm at gmail.com
Fri Feb 27 21:44:08 UTC 2015
2015-02-27 16:22 GMT+01:00 fly <lowflight66 at googlemail.com>:
> Did sleep one night and now think we should include bays and lanes
> within the lanes:-Tagging
To me it just does not feel right. I don't see a "lane" there...
> All together I am not happy with the description of lanes=* and
> lanes:*=* anymore. Where is it useful as we already do not count bicycle
> lanes but do count exclusive bus or taxi lanes and even ones with access
> forbidden but wide enough for motorized vehicles.
The key lanes and its subkeys are a misconception par excellence, no doubt
> Would prefer to change lanes=* and lanes:*=* to be the numbers with
> general access allowed and adding all additional lanes with access:lanes:
I'm all in! Changing the meaning of a key that's used about 5 million times
might get a little tricky though.
I wouldn't use lanes=2 in this example. 1+1=2
That's an excellent example why the current access scheme sucks for this.
Wouldn't that be A LOT easier?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging