[Tagging] Change of rendering: place of worship and terminal without building tag

[Mateusz Konieczny]

"I don't agree that place_of_worship requires a building."

Yes. But buildings that are PoW require a building tag.

See"to all buildings tagged with" in the first post.

2015-01-02 16:42 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com>:

> I don't agree that place_of_worship requires a building.
> E.g. the Lourdes grotto or perhaps modern versions of Stonehenge or ...
> In Christian religion there are several places with many small shrines,
> but the whole is a place of worship (sorry don't know the English word).
>
> The wiki page [1] states "typical tags in this context are [list of
> buildings}, so it is not a requirement.
>
> regards
>
> m
>
> [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship
>
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Matthijs Melissen <
> info at matthijsmelissen.nl> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> In the next version of the openstreetmap-carto style sheet (the
>> default rendering used on openstreetmap.org) there will be some
>> changes that might highlight current tagging errors.
>>
>> In particular, areas tagged with amenity=place_of_worship or
>> aeroway=terminal that do not have a building tag will be no longer
>> rendered as a building.
>>
>> It is therefore suggested to explicitly add a building=yes tag (or a
>> more specific building tag) to all buildings tagged with
>> amenity=place_of_worship or aeroway=terminal. Objects tagged as such
>> that are not buildings of course do not need to receive a building
>> tag.
>>
>> -- Matthijs
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150102/4a2baa4e/attachment-0001.html>