[Tagging] Change of rendering: place of worship and terminal without building tag

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Sat Jan 3 20:33:23 UTC 2015


I'm OK with this.  Pretty rare to see indoor (or even specifically
denominational!) PoWs at Boy Scout camps in the US from what I've seen.
On Jan 2, 2015 9:45 AM, "Mateusz Konieczny" <matkoniecz at gmail.com> wrote:

> "I don't agree that place_of_worship requires a building."
>
> Yes. But buildings that are PoW require a building tag.
>
> See"to all buildings tagged with" in the first post.
>
> 2015-01-02 16:42 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com>:
>
>> I don't agree that place_of_worship requires a building.
>> E.g. the Lourdes grotto or perhaps modern versions of Stonehenge or ...
>> In Christian religion there are several places with many small shrines,
>> but the whole is a place of worship (sorry don't know the English word).
>>
>> The wiki page [1] states "typical tags in this context are [list of
>> buildings}, so it is not a requirement.
>>
>> regards
>>
>> m
>>
>> [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Matthijs Melissen <
>> info at matthijsmelissen.nl> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> In the next version of the openstreetmap-carto style sheet (the
>>> default rendering used on openstreetmap.org) there will be some
>>> changes that might highlight current tagging errors.
>>>
>>> In particular, areas tagged with amenity=place_of_worship or
>>> aeroway=terminal that do not have a building tag will be no longer
>>> rendered as a building.
>>>
>>> It is therefore suggested to explicitly add a building=yes tag (or a
>>> more specific building tag) to all buildings tagged with
>>> amenity=place_of_worship or aeroway=terminal. Objects tagged as such
>>> that are not buildings of course do not need to receive a building
>>> tag.
>>>
>>> -- Matthijs
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150103/f342da8d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list