[Tagging] Change of rendering: place of worship and terminal without building tag

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at gmail.com
Fri Jan 2 18:18:33 UTC 2015


"parking areas, and in some cases even tennis and soccer pitches"

In this cases also amenity=place_of_worship probably is not necessary.
It sounds like operator=*, owner=* and maybe landuse=religious would be
 a better solution.

I am pretty sure that parkings are not used as place of worship.


2015-01-02 19:00 GMT+01:00 Matthijs Melissen <info at matthijsmelissen.nl>:

> I had a look in Padova, and I noticed that most polygons tagged
> amenity=place_of_worship in that area are not actually buildings. They
> include the gardens, parking areas, and in some cases even tennis and
> soccer pitches that apparently are part of the church. In such cases,
> a building=yes tag is of course not necessary, and I think it would
> also be an improvement if such areas are not rendered as buildings.
>
> I went through about 120 objects in Padova in 10 minutes or so, so
> checking them can be done quite quickly. I think the quickest way to
> handle this is by installing the Todo plugin in JOSM, opening the Bing
> layer, and using the Export-JOSM option. Then you can add all churches
> to the Todo list. Go to the next one with the "]" key.
>
> I'm not in charge of the release cycle, so I can't tell exactly when
> this will be rolled out, but I think the plan is to roll this out
> between now and a couple of days.
>
> I should also mention that the change will only influence the gray
> building-like rendering. The religion icon will stay in place
> independent of the absence or presence of a building tag.
>
> -- Matthijs
>
> On 2 January 2015 at 17:19, Volker Schmidt <voschix at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Matthijs,
> >
> > it looks that we will have a problem in Italy. I just ran your query on a
> > 90kmx100km area around Padova and obtained about 1000 potential problems.
> > Some of them are definitively churches.
> > I have put the problem on the Italian mailing list.
> >
> > What's the time schedule for this new version of the carto style?
> >
> > Volker
> >
> > On 2 January 2015 at 17:03, Matthijs Melissen <info at matthijsmelissen.nl>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Same query for amenity=place_of_worship:
> >> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/6Nj
> >>
> >> Note that this contains false positives. Nodes have been excluded from
> >> this query.
> >>
> >> -- Matthijs
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150102/dea59fe7/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list