[Tagging] Change of rendering: place of worship and terminal without building tag

[John Willis]

I thought tat was a feature, to actually deprecate the landuse from the buildings, so we don't have the similar issue again of a building and area rendered the same. 

If -carto rendered landuse=religious, then the POW would be tagged on buildings, sitting on the landuse with hopefully a complimentary rendering. 

Having them render the same is a bug, or if POW is tagged on a non-building tag, it should render landuse=religious the exact same  way. 

Javbw

> On Jan 5, 2015, at 12:07 AM, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> amenity=place of worship that is not rendered as area is a bug
> Thanks for a report - it is now on bugtracker as 
> https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1193
> 
> 2015-01-04 15:20 GMT+01:00 Dave F. <davefox at madasafish.com>:
>> Hi
>> 
>> Now that the render amendments have come through, It seems the comment below is inaccurate. It's not being rendered at all. Was that the intention? I was unaware the grey render was considered as 'building', especially since adding building=yes changed the colour.
>> 
>> Areas are mapped as religious that, as well a church building, include the likes of car parks, cemeteries, community halls etc. Maybe mapnik needs to show landuse=religious to compensate.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Dave F.
>> 
>>> On 02/01/2015 15:17, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>> 
>>> In particular, areas tagged with amenity=place_of_worship or
>>> aeroway=terminal that do not have a building tag will be no longer
>>> rendered as a building.
>> 
>> 
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> http://www.avast.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150106/49db0955/attachment.html>