[Tagging] pre-RFC: relation type=cluster/group

[Dan S]

Oh, sorry, I see you mention it in the proposal. Still I don't see
what would be bad about using "site" for the examples in your
proposal, but I'll leave that there since you presumably feel
differently.

Dan

2015-01-06 10:18 GMT+00:00 Dan S <danstowell+osm at gmail.com>:
> Hi -
>
> Does relation=site help? It sounds to me like a very similar concept:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Site
>
> Best
> Dan
>
> 2015-01-06 10:36 GMT+00:00 Friedrich Volkmann <bsd at volki.at>:
>> I was going to write a proposal for relation type=cluster
>> (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Cluster). Looking for
>> real-world examples, I noticed that there's a relation type=group for the
>> Great Lakes (id=1124369).
>>
>> What do you like better? type=group or type=cluster?
>>
>> --
>> Friedrich K. Volkmann       http://www.volki.at/
>> Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging