[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addrN:*

Janko Mihelić janjko at gmail.com
Thu Jan 15 11:43:30 UTC 2015


2015-01-15 12:23 GMT+01:00 Andrew Shadura <andrew at shadura.me>:

> On 15 January 2015 at 03:02, johnw <johnw at mac.com> wrote:
> > The proposal seems to be a good solution to this problem.
>
> This particular proposal seems to be a terrible solution to this
> problem. It requires changes to the software, and the tagging scheme
> is ugly as hell. At the same time, there's much simpler and better
> solution: placing address nodes inside the building polygon. This is
> already used, supported by any sort of software which can process
> regular OSM address tags, and it's not as ugly as addrN:.
>

With addrN:*=* it's clear that the same place has two addresses. If there
are two nodes, it seems like there are two places (Two entrances, two
apartments, two rooms), each with it's own address. AddrN* is clearly
superior in this aspect.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150115/41163441/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list