[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addrN:*

[Ineiev]

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:53:13PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 
> you could use polygons (e.g. 2 distinct multipolygons, one for each
> address), and add a note to inform your fellow mapping colleagues that the
> overlap is intended (note is not needed but nice).

I think this solution has an essential advantage: distinct
multipoligons with single addr:housenumbers can go do distinct
associatedStreet relations. you can't do it with addrN:; and
the mapper may want to use associatedStreet e.g. because
it provides a way to specify parallel addresses in different
languages (I believe, this feature is used in countries like Ukraine).