[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addrN:*

[Andrew Shadura]

On 19 January 2015 at 12:08, Dmitry Kiselev <dkiselev at osm.me> wrote:
>> In my country, both numbers are used concurrently
>> and together with street name
>
> Such thing, that you use conscription numbers
> and street numbers all together in a same time
> doesn't make conscription numbers "not an address"

I didn't say it's not an address at all, but it's not a separate
address. It's just a part of a regular address.

> You've said:
>
>> Praha, 606 might be not unique inside whole Praha without neighborhood
>> name.
>
> Ok, in such case "Praha, Central district, 606" should be unique, am I
> right?
>
> If conscription numbers, in your country are not valid without quarter or
> district or block
> (I don't know how you name such subdivisions within cites) it should be
> tagged.

Addr:street + addr:conscriptionnumber + addr:streetnumber (if exists)
is enough on a building to be correctly addressed in most of the cases
except where a building administratively belongs to a different
district in which it is located geographically, or if it's a village
with no street numbers (those a special cases we're not talking about
at the moment).

> And in such case, it's two addresses
> (ok they are binded together, it's not a problem), isn't it?

No, it's not two addresses, it's just a single one. It's just a
particular feature of it that you can omit a part of it (either of the
building numbers or sometimes the street name if you have the
conscription number).

-- 
Cheers,
  Andrew