[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addrN:*

Dmitry Kiselev dkiselev at osm.me
Mon Jan 19 11:36:13 UTC 2015


 > No, it's not two addresses, it's just a single one. It's just a
> particular feature of it that you can omit a part of it (either of the
> building numbers or sometimes the street name if you have the
> conscription number).

I've got your point, but I cant agree with you that it's not a multiple addresses tagging scheme.

Also I can't agree that there is no problems with points.

And I can't agree that addrN breaks some of the OSM principles.


Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:14:09 +0100 от Andrew Shadura <andrew at shadura.me>:
>On 19 January 2015 at 12:08, Dmitry Kiselev < dkiselev at osm.me > wrote:
>>> In my country, both numbers are used concurrently
>>> and together with street name
>>
>> Such thing, that you use conscription numbers
>> and street numbers all together in a same time
>> doesn't make conscription numbers "not an address"
>
>I didn't say it's not an address at all, but it's not a separate
>address. It's just a part of a regular address.
>
>> You've said:
>>
>>> Praha, 606 might be not unique inside whole Praha without neighborhood
>>> name.
>>
>> Ok, in such case "Praha, Central district, 606" should be unique, am I
>> right?
>>
>> If conscription numbers, in your country are not valid without quarter or
>> district or block
>> (I don't know how you name such subdivisions within cites) it should be
>> tagged.
>
>Addr:street + addr:conscriptionnumber + addr:streetnumber (if exists)
>is enough on a building to be correctly addressed in most of the cases
>except where a building administratively belongs to a different
>district in which it is located geographically, or if it's a village
>with no street numbers (those a special cases we're not talking about
>at the moment).
>
>> And in such case, it's two addresses
>> (ok they are binded together, it's not a problem), isn't it?
>
>No, it's not two addresses, it's just a single one. It's just a
>particular feature of it that you can omit a part of it (either of the
>building numbers or sometimes the street name if you have the
>conscription number).
>
>-- 
>Cheers,
>  Andrew

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150119/b49f6181/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list