[Tagging] Deprecation of associatedStreet-relations

[Jo]

Not me.           Oh, that was a rethorical question.

Polyglot

2015-01-24 1:07 GMT+01:00 Christian Quest <cquest at openstreetmap.fr>:

>
> Le 22/01/2015 22:49, Johan C a écrit :
> > Good to have this discussion. From a computer expert point-of-view
> > relations are fantastic for data integrity and to keep database size
> > low. From an OSM point-of-view, which includes being friendly towards
> > novice users, relations should be avoided whenever possible. And
> > associatedStreet relations are avoidable.
>
> A novice user will hardly break an associatedStreet relation, but will
> more often break addr:* when updating a streetname without updating
> related addresses.
> It is much harder to detect the second at the QA level.
>
> If simplicity is our new mantra, who will be the first propose to
> deprecate the public_transport relation based tagging scheme ?
>
> --
> Christian Quest - OpenStreetMap France
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150124/ac00fdc3/attachment-0001.html>