[Tagging] Lifecycle concepts, "REMOVED"

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Yes, my opinion is that all highway=proposed should be removed.

OSM should map current situation - not what was there or what will be.

"after it is obvious the proposed road will never be built" sounds nice but
always there will be somebody convinced that proposal is real. For example
my city has multiple proposed roads - that are in official planes for
decades
(one since at least 1960s), with start of construction "within 25 years"
since
initial proposal.


2015-01-29 0:53 GMT+01:00 Shawn K. Quinn <skquinn at rushpost.com>:

> On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 22:42 +0100, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> > Yes, feature that does not exist anymore (or even never existed!) or
> > is only proposed has no place in OSM.
>
> So you want to get rid of proposed roads, too?
>
> Having a proposed road on the map is good to see what has been planned
> for the future. Now, after it is obvious the proposed road will never be
> built, that's a different story, it should be removed.
>
> --
> Shawn K. Quinn <skquinn at rushpost.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150129/f1051b39/attachment.html>