[Tagging] Highway proposed/planned distinction

johnw johnw at mac.com
Thu Jul 16 10:17:08 UTC 2015

Ran into this issue today.  They are constructing a new trunk road in an area I’m mapping, an as is usual for Japan, they build the road in stages, completing one stage before they go to the next. I know, down to about 20m, the alignment of the sections to be built - so do I mark the whole road as construction=, or do I leave the section which hasn’t had the ground broken yet as “planned”?  even though the road as a whole is under construction and will be built?

Section under construction  (official Govt docs)
http://www.pref.chiba.lg.jp/kitachi-do/documents/panf-3.pdf <http://www.pref.chiba.lg.jp/kitachi-do/documents/panf-3.pdf>

http://www.pref.chiba.lg.jp/kitachi-do/documents/panf-4.pdf <http://www.pref.chiba.lg.jp/kitachi-do/documents/panf-4.pdf>
Half under construction, Right half not started yet.


> On Jul 15, 2015, at 5:53 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> sent from a phone
> Am 15.07.2015 um 00:51 schrieb moltonel <moltonel at gmail.com>:
>>> On 14 July 2015 19:57:30 GMT+01:00, jonathan at bigfatfrog67.me wrote:
>>> Linguistically I would say proposed comes before planned.  Planning
>>> your wedding is not the same as proposing marriage!  
>> +1
> when you're planning to marry someone it might be much farther away then when you already propose wedding locations ;-)
> I agree generally though, planned seems more advanced than proposed. 
> Cheers 
> Martin 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150716/5068d789/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list