[Tagging] Highway proposed/planned distinction

Thu Jul 16 11:29:25 UTC 2015

I would say it depends if the untouched land is still in its original use or not.  If it is then mark it as planned, if it’s cordoned off waiting for the construction to get there then I would mark it as under construction.

Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me

From: johnw
Sent: ‎Thursday‎, ‎16‎ ‎July‎ ‎2015 ‎11‎:‎17
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools

Ran into this issue today.  They are constructing a new trunk road in an area I’m mapping, an as is usual for Japan, they build the road in stages, completing one stage before they go to the next. I know, down to about 20m, the alignment of the sections to be built - so do I mark the whole road as construction=, or do I leave the section which hasn’t had the ground broken yet as “planned”?  even though the road as a whole is under construction and will be built?

Section under construction  (official Govt docs)

http://www.pref.chiba.lg.jp/kitachi-do/documents/panf-3.pdf

http://www.pref.chiba.lg.jp/kitachi-do/documents/panf-4.pdf

Half under construction, Right half not started yet.

Javbw

On Jul 15, 2015, at 5:53 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:

sent from a phone

Am 15.07.2015 um 00:51 schrieb moltonel <moltonel at gmail.com>:

On 14 July 2015 19:57:30 GMT+01:00, jonathan at bigfatfrog67.me wrote:
Linguistically I would say proposed comes before planned.  Planning
your wedding is not the same as proposing marriage!  

+1

when you're planning to marry someone it might be much farther away then when you already propose wedding locations ;-)

I agree generally though, planned seems more advanced than proposed. 

Cheers 
Martin 
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150716/7d514d84/attachment.html>